Posts: 10

Before I choose an escort I now (since March ) check to make sure they have at least 1 postive review on both  AW and UKPunting.  This was after I stupidly met the Polish woman so called ''Hot Caroline'' in late  February without doing this and ended up with a weird munter !  

I subsequently found out that Hot Caroline  did have a negative review on UKP that I had failed to search for fully (its difficult with UKP as unless you area member you can't search for a particular person but have to trawl through all the reviews for all the possible regions - so London, South East, East England - etc. loooking for the name of the escort you are interested in from her AW profile ).

  I had been lucky to have experienced a string of really good encounters with Polish woman and had made the mistake of thinking they were all likely to be genuine good punts if I just kept on visiting Poles.  The poor encounter with ''Hot Caroline'' reminded me that you have to do your research on all potential visits if you want to reduce the risk of wasting your money !.

 

I find the AW site quite good because although the postive comments have to be approved by the escort or her admin person before being visible a punter can in fact make a booking after a visit and state in the message that they can't attend the 2nd visit but are making the booking only so that that they can provide a review the previous completed visit.  Then if this ''booking'' is not confirmed by the escort / admin the punter can still post a ''feedback only'' comment after the time of the booking has passed.  This feedback only comment is then visible to all viewers of the escort's profile.   Of course the escort can respond on AW and say she never met the client at all and that it is fake feedback.  However,  its noticeable that if the escort has more than a couple of negative comments as feedback only on AW then the ratio of red / negative reviews to green positive ones on the UKP site is also very likely to be higher.  So the conclusion you can draw from this is that  the escort you have found on AW  is probably not worth taking a risk on.

 

With the postive feedback on AW I find its a good idea to click on the number of the responses that the actual reviewer has cos if you read the feedback the reviewer has received from escorts you can get an idea of whether the review was likely to have been a genuine punter  or just someone helping that partiucular escort.  

I've noticed that a lot of the Romanian girls in the Farnborough area have postive comments from ''clients'' but when you check you find all  these clients have 0 or only 1 comment from an other escort (conclusion being the review is fake as no other ''non Romanian '' escorts have commented on the reviewer themselves i.e they are not an active punter.

 

Some of the Thai girls on AW get their friends to use their own accounts to post a positive review about the new escort but these are easy to spot because the name of the reviewer includes the name ''Thai xx '' and also the english is very poor or previous comments just get reused out of context  LOL !.  For example Vienna_Thai often gives positive reviews to other Thai escorts.  She probably thinks she is doing them a favour but I feel this type of behaviour  just undermines the punters faith in the number of positve reviews being genuine.

Anway the point im trying to amke is that reading the reviews of the people doing the reviews gives you an idea of whether the escort's profile on AW  is just bullshit.  

 

Having said all that in December I did find one Thai lady on AW called Alice Thai sexy who had 9 reviews all from ''member not active'' This was of course highly suspicious but I visited her anyway as I liked the look of her pics and there were no other good alternative options on that particular day and I really fancied a BJ !.  As it turned out  Alice Thai was great. She was pretty, had a good figure and was extremely enthusiastic providing great kissing and oral and being highly responsive throughout the visit.  So it just goes to show that sometimes it is worth taking a risk as sometimes things can turn out really well despite any misgivings you might have ! 

Before I choose an escort I now (since March ) check to make sure they have at least 1 postive review on both  AW and UKPunting.  This was after I stupidly met the Polish woman so called ''Hot Caroline'' in late  February without doing this and ended up with a weird munter !  

I subsequently found out that Hot Caroline  did have a negative review on UKP that I had failed to search for fully (its difficult with UKP as unless you area member you can't search for a particular person but have to trawl through all the reviews for all the possible regions - so London, South East, East England - etc. loooking for the name of the escort you are interested in from her AW profile ).

  I had been lucky to have experienced a string of really good encounters with Polish woman and had made the mistake of thinking they were all likely to be genuine good punts if I just kept on visiting Poles.  The poor encounter with ''Hot Caroline'' reminded me that you have to do your research on all potential visits if you want to reduce the risk of wasting your money !.

 

I find the AW site quite good because although the postive comments have to be approved by the escort or her admin person before being visible a punter can in fact make a booking after a visit and state in the message that they can't attend the 2nd visit but are making the booking only so that that they can provide a review the previous completed visit.  Then if this ''booking'' is not confirmed by the escort / admin the punter can still post a ''feedback only'' comment after the time of the booking has passed.  This feedback only comment is then visible to all viewers of the escort's profile.   Of course the escort can respond on AW and say she never met the client at all and that it is fake feedback.  However,  its noticeable that if the escort has more than a couple of negative comments as feedback only on AW then the ratio of red / negative reviews to green positive ones on the UKP site is also very likely to be higher.  So the conclusion you can draw from this is that  the escort you have found on AW  is probably not worth taking a risk on.

 

With the postive feedback on AW I find its a good idea to click on the number of the responses that the actual reviewer has cos if you read the feedback the reviewer has received from escorts you can get an idea of whether the review was likely to have been a genuine punter  or just someone helping that partiucular escort.  

I've noticed that a lot of the Romanian girls in the Farnborough area have postive comments from ''clients'' but when you check you find all  these clients have 0 or only 1 comment from an other escort (conclusion being the review is fake as no other ''non Romanian '' escorts have commented on the reviewer themselves i.e they are not an active punter.

 

Some of the Thai girls on AW get their friends to use their own accounts to post a positive review about the new escort but these are easy to spot because the name of the reviewer includes the name ''Thai xx '' and also the english is very poor or previous comments just get reused out of context  LOL !.  For example Vienna_Thai often gives positive reviews to other Thai escorts.  She probably thinks she is doing them a favour but I feel this type of behaviour  just undermines the punters faith in the number of positve reviews being genuine.

Anway the point im trying to amke is that reading the reviews of the people doing the reviews gives you an idea of whether the escort's profile on AW  is just bullshit.  

 

Having said all that in December I did find one Thai lady on AW called Alice Thai sexy who had 9 reviews all from ''member not active'' This was of course highly suspicious but I visited her anyway as I liked the look of her pics and there were no other good alternative options on that particular day and I really fancied a BJ !.  As it turned out  Alice Thai was great. She was pretty, had a good figure and was extremely enthusiastic providing great kissing and oral and being highly responsive throughout the visit.  So it just goes to show that sometimes it is worth taking a risk as sometimes things can turn out really well despite any misgivings you might have ! 

lol that's how we should deal with scammers....

Slingshotz

You should have replied ''I'm Khan12ad, you should be paying me bitch!''

She texted back I will have a big problem if I reported from her big boss . So I reported her on viva street . Account got taken down 2 hours later 

You should have replied ''I'm Khan12ad, you should be paying me bitch!''

Slingshotz
khan12ad

What's your protocol before choosing your escort: 

• First and foremost check reviews 

• Good profile with saucy outfits

• More green then red likes and dislikes the girl has 

• No  attitude on phone or very delayed response 

No deposit demands. 

Funny you should say that. I just had an escort ask me for  £60 up front deposit before she gave address. Replied back " Bye " 

khan12ad

What's your protocol before choosing your escort: 

• First and foremost check reviews 

• Good profile with saucy outfits

• More green then red likes and dislikes the girl has 

• No  attitude on phone or very delayed response 

No deposit demands. 

Comms are most important to me. If an escort turns out to be stuck up or unresponsive, i'm not gonna book her.

It's similar to that, i would just add in the list service offer check in and google image search to check if pics are stolen  (that's a red flag).

What's your protocol before choosing your escort: 

• First and foremost check reviews 

• Good profile with saucy outfits

• More green then red likes and dislikes the girl has 

• No  attitude on phone or very delayed response 

Posts: 10
Total number of topics: 1977 Total number of posts: 18492