Punted this one for eye-watering money. It was a huge disappointment. First of all she's not even close to the photos. She was a lot older and skinnier. Also wasn't too interested in pleasing me, services were passionless and transactional. Very weird meeting, both of us  just wanted to finish it ASAP as neither of us wasn't feeling comfortable. 

Why i'm posting this on the forum? Because her profile (the one of Kings Lover agency) went off after my review and i don't want someone else to experience the same 'service'.

Here is her second profile:

https://www.escortrankings.uk/angelica-escort-london-271411

You really give a grand for this one? Mate you could have foursome with half of that.

It's just one of my things. I meet upscale girls only. It was so far so good, until this one.

Bro, it can happen that you just don't click with someone, that's not always her fault. Being skinnier is much better than being bigger than photos, as many other girls are. Also she's certainly not "lot older"since many agencies ( at least those I know) asking ID. Not even close to photos? You must be blind. There is also video of her in both agencies - so if it's too skinny for you, you shouldn't book. I booked and I was really satisfied. I think it's much more about you to post fake reviews about her everywhere. That's screaming some complexes. Let others make their own opinion.

Both of you 'guys' seem very upset about my review. Why would you be triggered by some review of a girl who earns grand for doing nothing? 

Come on Angelica, you can do better than this.

@peter3356 Sorry, but why is his review fake but yours isn't? Or we aren't allowed to leave a subjective feedback just because she costs 1k so we MUST like her? Or because "she's also very expensive dressed etc" because we pay tousands of pounds on escorts just to dress expensive? 

The thread you've posted is from 2022 and his review is recent, plus I checked more of her feedback on UKPunting and she isn't the best rated (even has some recent negative reviews) so I do believe him rather than you. Your posts look like she wrote herself trying to defend which is just lame. All punters know that a lot of agencies use photoshoped or filtered images and that they don't always match the reality, not even videos. This is why we always state how accurate are pics when reviewing. Some agencies take deposit from punters so you don't know why he proceeded with the meet. We don't always walk away just because we initially didn't like someone's look, maybe she has more to offer, he also clearly stated that the level of her service was low. 

Why are you bothered really? Angelica, just because someone left a negative feedback on you (which is purely subjective), doesn't mean others won't decide to book you and have their own experience. I can't name how many times I visited some SPs who didn't have the best score and had a good time with them, or otherwise. Coming to Forums and insulting punters for having their own opinion is just pathetic. You should work more on your attitude and level of your service than arguing on the Forums. 

@Pendiante456 I answered because this person is posting negative feedbacks everywhere, and also the UK punting post you mentioned is from him. How do I know that? All the reviews appeared same week even same day, with same lies and since it was shortly before my booking with her, I noticed. Why I think it's fake and even he doesn't believe of what he's saying? Because in his other post( from the same nickname) he said she's is good looking and 4* out of 5* photos accuracy just skinnier but lazy and mechanical service and here ( from the same nickname again ) he stated "not even close to the photos". So for me is obvious there is something wrong, and that's why I must be her? No mate. If you don't know the whole situation with this person, do not comment. Negative review is one thing, but this is quite obssesive in my opinion. Normal person will leave max one review, that's it. He's behaving like jealous ex. 

Yes, it used to be like that, many agencies didn't verify the girls in the past but now I know it's really different but it's also depends on agency but I only using the trusted ones I have had good experiences with, and that's what I'm talking about. I said the photos and video is recent, since I met her now, and met another girls from the agency beofre. So I can say none of what he's saying is true. Opinion on service is one thing, but the photos looks exactly like her no one can't say otherwise. Exactly, I said as well is subjective how they click with someone, and just because people doesn't click or wants for different kind of service and didn't like it, or have a bigger expactions doesn't mean he has to create multiple fake accounts and post fake reviews everywhere, isn't enough to say once? .Just because some people can recognise obsessive behaviour doesn't mean it's the girl themselves. Also he's said he doesn't want other people to book her. I don't think this is normal. It's a continuous harassment. I don't have time to argue and I don't care enough. But since I noticed this obvious harassment and therefore, I made others aware. 

And yes. I'd cancel booking in arrival if the punt "looks nothing like the photos" even with deposit, which can be used as cancellation fee. 

This person has nothing to with a standard punter or standard review. 

Im here for the show lol 

And @OTPPRfs, you should def leave another review on her active profiles! you brought the rage out of her, punters should see what kind of person they are paying lol